A short
summary of articles by Xie, and Walsh
Xie’s article
details a study of the state of Classroom interactions in China. While, Walsh
deals more with teacher to student interactions and the negative and positive
effects of teacher talk time or, TTT. The metering of teacher input, called by
Walsh as being constructive and obstructive teaching. Whereas constructive was
beneficial to student talk, productive in producing better sentences from
students and in the long run, becoming more contemplative through the use of
waiting time. Obstructive teaching was directed at the imbalance of TTT. Too much
leads to students essentially switching off. Interrupt too many times or finish
a students utterances and students will switch off. Why think and try hard when
the teacher is going to do that for you?
Xie
throughout her article refers back to the state of classrooms in ESL classrooms
in China. She stated that the classrooms that were taught by native Chinese
used dated methods, more akin to their subject teaching. The methodology of ESL
teaching is greatly different to that of subject teaching. Better classroom
interactions and the quality of classroom life are ways to better teacher to
student and student to student dialogues.
I’m
going to apply the interaction patterns to my classes. In thinking of the
patterns, I do ask a lot of questions, both display and referential type questions.
But what I would like to implement is student to student interactions. I have
my own ruminations on this, but a general question to the readership out there,
is, can you share any methods, tips or tricks with the rest of us?
Some coming today, perhaps, and one general one is just to let ss discuss a question you have modeled before you TSST...
ReplyDeleteAlso - you're still making traditional assumptions about 'subject-teaching'. I'm teaching a subject, Methodology, and yet I try to do it very interactively/communicatively, so that ss' can both improve language skills where necessarry, and contribute to the teaching. It's called CBI (content-based instruction), or CLIL by the Brits.
Agreed, I do need to learn more teaching models other ha the traditional subject-teaching one.
DeleteWil havr to try that one in class, given that the KET doesn't jump the gun on the aiting time. In light of teaching Elementary grade students, discussion of an answer in groups would be the way to go.